Here's a perfect example of emoting instead of thinking, brought to you by TigerHill:
Allowing students to carry guns would not prevent the first shooting. Allowing students to carry guns would not prevent the second shootings [sic]. One off-kilter man with a gun can kill a person more [sic] matter what you do. Futhermore, the more realistic measure to prevent the second wave of shootings seems to be strengthened and continued lockdown after the first shootings.
One off-kilter man with a gun can kill a person, no matter what you do. But if he’s surrounded by people who also have guns, the off-kilter man will never get a chance to kill 33 people.
Well, I'm sorry you disagree with me, and I'm sorry for the grammatical error in my post. It's been fixed. I still think students carrying guns on campus is not the best response. I have a CW license in Texas...I had one in Tennesse as well. Futhermore, I believe in my constitutional right to bear arms. I just don't think schools and universities should apply for public safety reasons. Yes, this psycho wouldn't have killed 32 if a few thousand students were armed. However, if the university and local law enforcement would have taken the threat more seriously after the first shooting, we wouldn't have 32 dead either.