April 2006 Archives

Paul Burtzlaff has had quite a busy day today. Besides conducting worship services like he does every Sunday, he was out pounding the pavement and working the phones to get out the vote for Tuesday's primary. Earlier this evening, he sat down for an hour with the crew from Meet The Bloggers, then headed back to the church to watch his wife sing with the choir in a concert. After that, he e-mailed me his responses to an e-mail interview I requested a short time ago. I don't know where he gets the energy for this (I'd be comatose by now)!

Anyway, without further delay, here's my interview with Paul S. Burtzlaff!

If you could communicate one thing about yourself to the voters in Ohio's 13th District (perhaps something under-reported), what would it be?

Like the constituents I will serve in Washington, I go to work every day, I roll up my sleeves and earn a paycheck. As a former small businessman, I respect the value of a dollar. My family and I face the same struggles and challenges as the District 13 voters. I have spent my life in SERVICE � service to my country in the United States Navy, service to families and students as a professor, teacher, and school administrator, and service to my congregation as a pastor and family life minister. Paul S. Burtzlaff stands for the common person and is committed to service

What would be your top policy priority if you were elected to the House of Representatives?

Restoring Integrity and trust in our elected leaders. Good government and trusted leadership are under scrutiny at the federal, state, and district 13 levels. IN ORDER TO EFFECT REAL CHANGE, we must first restore the public trust in our elected leaders. That trust, once earned, provides the gateway for the open and candid discussion of economic, social, and safety issues confronting the 13th Congressional District. My first policy action will be to institute an �open door policy� with District 13 constituents, business, social, and civic leaders, including regional District offices, numerous neighborhood and community meetings, and a high level of outreach by my congressional staff and me.

Under what conditions should U.S. military forces come home from Iraq and Afghanistan? Should they be immediately withdrawn as proposed by Congressman John Murtha (D-PA)? What should be Congress' role in the War on Terror?

It is crucial that our military and diplomatic forces continue to assist the Iraqi and Afghan peoples attain self-governance. A step-by-step action plan, such as the one in place, should be followed for the orderly and systematic withdrawal of forces from these nations. To withdraw our troops (and those of our participating allies) prematurely could result in heightened political instability throughout the Middle East.

Even worse, to pull out of these nations before they are effectively governing their peoples could signal a psychological victory for terrorist organizations and their supporters, thereby putting our borders at risk for future attack.

Terrorist organizations need to respect the United States and its will to protect liberty, as they did when Ronald Reagan led our great nation.

The Cleveland Plain Dealer recently characterized you as not fully backing President Bush's conduct of the war in Iraq, and I must note that you sounded pretty tentative in the article. This has bothered some conservative Ohio bloggers, and no doubt lots of other folks too. How do you explain your answers? Here are the quotes I'm referring to.

PD: Has President Bush been good for the 13th Congressional District? Burtzlaff: "I don't know that he has necessarily been good for the district."

Let me explain the context for this response.

The Republican-led Congress and President Bush�s administration have championed a number of wonderful things in the last five-plus years, including meaningful tax relief, a rebounding economy, a shrinking unemployment rate for the nation, prescription drug legislation for our Older Americans, and the beginning of education reform and enhancement through the �No Child Left Behind� Act.

A president focuses on the entire nation, not just on the particular needs of a specific congressional district. District 13 has a diverse work force, educational basis, a changing industrial base, and room for growth and development. The needs of the District are unique and are in some ways at odds with the national needs. This is what prompted my response.

PD: Was the United States correct to send troops to Iraq? Burtzlaff: "I don't know. I fully support our men and women in the armed forces. You need to get them out as soon as possible."

My answer to the decision to send troops into Iraq was based on an intellectual view. We will never really know whether Saddam Hussein actually concealed and held active weapons of mass destruction immediately prior to the re-entering Iraq, though we do know he committed mass genocide and previously used the WMD�s ON HIS OWN PEOPLE.. I do support the President�s decision to enter Iraq, as I supported Desert Storm, based on the information he had available and based on Saddam�s refusal to follow United Nations directives. Once our objectives of helping the Iraqis gain meaningful self-governance, we should withdraw our troops as expeditiously as possible.

Whether or not you support all of President Bush's policies and priorities, do you consider him to be trustworthy?

Yes I consider President Bush to be honest, sincere and straightforward. I believe he makes reasoned decisions based on the information provided to him. I believe he honestly communicates his policy decisions to the American people.

How would you define America's enemies in this war (I mean more here than just naming a list of countries)? Who or what are we fighting, exactly?

If you are alluding to the War on Terror, America is threatened by those who insist on the imposition of fear and intimidation as a means of governance, those who choose to create global instability - politically, militarily, and economically - as a means of gaining control, those who see the United States as divided and lacking the will to protect its citizens and those others who seek freedom in a democratic society.

The price of gasoline has been rising lately, and Americans have begun to complain loudly. What (if anything) should Congress do to lower the price of gas at the pump? Should it permit exploration for more sources of oil (say, by drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge or in the Gulf of Mexico)? Should the government reduce taxes on gasoline? Do you support President Bush's temporary halt of additions to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve? What about his relaxation of regional EPA standards on clean fuel? Should Congress do anything else?

We live in a free market society, so we must exercise great care to avoid exercising emotional will over small and big business. Basic economic concepts of competition and supply and demand must be encouraged. One of the biggest issues Congress has grappled with for three decades is our growing dependence on foreign oil. The demand for petroleum, steel, lumber and other raw materials by the Chinese government further strains the limited global supplies.

Our refining capacity ground to a standstill over twenty years ago [thanks to] the Democrat-controlled Congress.

We need to further expand our oil exploration (in as environmentally safe manner as possible), invest in research and development of alternative fuels, such as hydrogen and ethanol (which has been available for over a quarter century) with the ultimate goal of reducing significantly our dependence on foreign nations to supply all our needs.

What are your views on immigration? What should the federal government's policy priorities be on this issue?

I support the efforts of Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-52) from Southern California who for more than 25 years has led the charge to enforce our immigration laws through interdiction. Now, more than ever, we need to enforce the laws and secure our borders against the illegal proliferation of terrorists, drug dealers and criminals.

I am sensitive to the plight of those immigrants who fled their country due to social, economic, or political reasons. We need to balance those sensitivities against the stress illegal immigrants place on our welfare, educational, and social infrastructures. The solution in addressing those illegal immigrants should not be hast � rather a balanced, non-partisan dialogue must be commenced.

[Ed.: Rep. Hunter's site is here.]

On your campaign web site, you say "We need to do everything possible to maintain, improve and expand our current industry and job markets while recognizing and preparing for a shift in markets." The national economy's doing well, but the common perception in Ohio is that our state is hurting badly. What's wrong with Ohio's economy, and what (if anything) should be Congress' role in fixing it?

You are correct in noting that Ohio, center of the Rust Belt, has suffered with the loss of major manufacturing, including in the steel and automotive industries. We see those impacts in Lorain County and the City of Cleveland.

The issues are complex and involve the Federal, the State, county and local governments, who must work in partnership to effect real change. Our goals must be to develop and expand our technologies in order to compete in the world marketplace. To do so, we need to encourage research and development of a whole new series of cutting edge technologies so we can regain global competitiveness. Tax credits for research, similar to President Reagan�s in 1981, should be strongly considered.

On overseas outsourcing, the Medina County Gazette quoted you as saying: "I believe education is the answer. We need to pave the road for research and development and training to be able to fill those positions locally." How do you propose to implement that, specifically?

The threshold issue is that the Federal Government, the State, the local school districts and, most importantly, the family, must all make a commitment to excellence in education. Without one of these groups, excellence simply cannot occur.

Once the mutual commitment is made, all parties can engage in meaningful dialogue promoting heightened educational standards and results with a commitment to invest in R & D.

On your campaign web site, you say "It is imperative that we provide the highest quality education for our children, preparing them for professions and careers where they will thrive, enjoy their chosen vocation, contribute to society and provide for their families." What should Congress do to achieve this? Do school vouchers figure into your plan?

We are a country of liberty, freedom, and self determination. Although school funding and standards are generally a state issue, the Federal Government should encourage excellence within the states and allow for each family to decide what school system can best help their children excel and maximize his or her potential. School vouchers should be allowed so that a homeowner is not penalized because he or she felt their child could get a better education at a private versus a public school.

Please summarize your position on abortion. What (if anything) should Congress do about the issue?

The Ohio Right to Life organization has endorsed my candidacy. I am pro-life and believe life begins at conception.

I am a staunch believer in federalism, and I believe that this is generally a state issue. Nonetheless I would support a constitutional amendment banning abortion.

Please summarize your position on homosexual marriage. What (if anything) should Congress do about the issue?

I would support legislation defining marriage as the union between a man and a women (alternatively banning same sex marriage) as well as a constitutional amendment.

Should Congress do anything to permanently prohibit the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes?

This issue invokes the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution. This is a state issue under our system of federalism. The United States Supreme Court has so ruled and I support our separation of powers.

What should Congress do about the estate tax (a.k.a. the "death tax")?

There are several tax issues which merit review In 2011, the tax rate relief, new 10-percent tax bracket, death tax repeal, marriage penalty relief, small business expensing, and all the remaining tax relief enacted over the past three years will sunset, resulting in tax increases for every individual American man or woman who pays income taxes.

I believe these repeals should be made permanent.

Please contrast the Republican and Democratic parties. What should voters remember on Primary Election Day and on General Election Day?

In the last two decades both the republican and Democrat parties have gravitated �to the center� on several issues, thereby, on occasion, blurring the differences between them.

Traditionally the Democrats have been characterized by their �tax and spend� policies, social welfare programs, and demands for entitlements.

Conversely Republicans have been known for supporting a strong defense, limited government, federalism, and self determination.

District 13 voters should ask themselves two questions:

1. "Who can I trust to best represent my family and I and our interests, with integrity, in Washington?"

2. "Who is sensitive to the issues we face every day yet strong enough to stand up for us, locally, nationally, and internationally?"

As a veteran, former small businessman, educator and minister, Paul S. Burtzlaff is best equipped to represent District 13 with integrity.


The silence is deafening

user-pic

I'm not hearing anything from any Republican candidates in the 13th District except for Paul Burtzlaff (who I endorse). Is it because the other candidates have no money left? Or is their network of supporters and volunteers not up to making phone calls or sending out mailings? It looks like the other guys are riding it out until the primary on Tuesday.

Craig Foltin, the guy the Ohio GOP has anointed as their chosen moderate, did send a mailing to my parents this past week. They live in the district too, not far from me. But I'm a registered Republican, and I've seen nothing in the mail. Nor have I gotten a phone call. Ken Blackwell's campaign found my phone number easily enough. Why haven't Foltin's people called?

Absent any serious effort from Foltin, he seems to be relying on a single issue to get himself elected by the Republican base: "Newspapers and Republican bigshots have endorsed me, so vote for me!"

Meanwhile, Burtzlaff and his volunteers have been making calls and sending out mailings. Here's the introductory brochure that went out last week:

Here's the Burtzlaff vs. Foltin comparison mailing that went out yesterday and today:

It's nothing fancy; just an issue-by-issue comparison. But combine these targeted mailings with the Burtzlaff campaign's phone banks and door-to-door stumping, and you've got a classic ground campaign for a U.S. House seat.

Could there be an upset in the offing? Stay tuned. I'll have details from Paul Burtzlaff's Meet The Bloggers session, and some more "inside baseball" stuff in the next couple of days.

I'll be attending tomorrow's Meet The Bloggers session, where the guy in the spotlight this time is Paul Burtzlaff, Republican candidate for Ohio's 13th U.S. House District. Do any of you readers have questions you'd like me to ask him?

Liveblogging the Ohio primary election

user-pic

Are you a conservative politics junkie? Can't get enough detailed coverage of Ohio politics? Wondering how to satisfy your cravings on primary election day, this Tuesday May 2nd?

Help is on the way! Go to the State of Ohio Blogger Alliance HQ, where 22 center-right Ohioans will be liveblogging the election!

Site hosting problems

user-pic

I apologize for the spotty presence today. The host for my blog is apparently having technical problems, so my blog either appears as a blank white screen or as a fourteen-month-old outdated version of itself. I also can't seem to find any individual posts. Hopefully things will be restored soon.

UPDATE (4/29): I think everything's back to normal. I hope.

Carnival of Ohio Politics #20

user-pic

Newshound has the latest roundup of Ohio political blogging. Pull up a seat and dig in.

Where's Bill Pierce's FEC report?

user-pic

Bill Pierce is absent from the latest FEC Financial Summary Reports for the U.S. Senate race in Ohio. What's up with that?

What happened to Charles DeLorean?

user-pic

Charles DeLorean isn't listed in the latest FEC Financial Summary Reports for Ohio's 13th Congressional District. Did he neglect to file? Has he dropped out?

Capri Cafaro, Democratic candidate for Ohio's 13th District U.S. House seat, sat down for an hour on April 5th with the crew from Meet The Bloggers. Here's the podcast, and here's the transcript.

Democrats, pleasepleasePLEASE nominate her.

In a survey of likely Ohio voters conducted on April 24th that focused mostly on the U.S. Senate race, there are some interesting tidbits on immigration buried in the results. From the summary:

Ohioans are more closely divided than voters in other states over whether illegal aliens should be forced to leave. Forty percent (40%) say Yes, 43% say No, and 17% are Not Sure. Still, a majority of Ohio's likely voters, 56%, say that our policy goal should generally be to welcome immigrants who are not criminals, security threats, or exploiters of welfare programs. DeWine wins a plurality of voters who agree with that sentiment.

By a smaller margin DeWine also wins a plurality of the larger number of likely voters (76%) who say controlling the borders and enforcing existing immigration law should be accomplished before any further reform.

...

The telephone survey of 500 Likely Voters was conducted by Rasmussen Reports April 19, 2006. The margin of sampling error for the survey is +/- 4.5 percentage points at the midpoint with a 95% level of confidence.

Clearly these are reliable results, especially on border control & enforcement. 76% is nothing to sneeze at, so U.S. Senate and U.S. House candidates should take note.

Hot Air has a great re-cap of the illegal leaking allegations surrounding fired CIA bigwig Mary McCarthy.

I apologize for missing a very effective takedown of Lorain Mayor Craig Foltin, courtesy of Scott Bakalar. I promise to pay closer attention from now on.

Urgent help needed to save a life

user-pic

John Hawkins is asking for help to save the life of a hospitalized Houston woman who doesn't want to die ... but the hospital is hell-bent on removing her treatment. This one's a real Catch-22 situation, so publicity will be essential to breaking the impasse.

Update: A life spared!

Ohio Political Insider wonders what might happen in the 13th District primary on May 2nd if reliable pro-life candidate Paul Burtzlaff can motivate pro-life Republicans to turn out:

With over 9,000 registered republican pro life residents, could you picture them banding together and voting their pro-life candidate into the general election?

Could you picture the look of perplexity in the Foltin camp if the the pro-life block casts their support behind Paul S. Burtzlaff, a naval veteran, and pro-life family minister and former small business owner? After all at least 1 pro-life organization has thrown its support behind Burtzlaff.

You heard it first here: DON'T BE SURPRISED IF PAUL S. BURTZLAFF FINISHES STRONG IN THE PRIMARY.

Not to nitpick, but I've been on that bandwagon awhile myself.

I wonder why Mayor Foltin (the anointed GOP establishment candidate) hasn't mentioned much about pro-life issues?

Illustrating virtual logic

user-pic

The Senate seems determined to ignore public demand for a wall along the entire U.S./Mexican border, and instead proposes various "virtual fences" to stop illegal aliens. To illustrate the "virtual logic" of our senators, I'm going to expand the idea I had yesterday when I posted this graphic ...

Virtual fence
Virtual fence

... and take the "virtual" fad to its logical conclusion:


Virtual army

Virtual navy

Virtual air force

Virtual race car

Virtual prison

Virtual success

Virtual intellectual

Virtual president

Whaddaya think? If anybody else has examples like these, post them and leave a trackback. This could be fun!

Michelle Malkin announces a new conservative Internet broadcast network called Hot Air. Check it out, and sign up for comment-posting privileges while the opportunity lasts.

Navy SEAL recruiting commercial

user-pic

I was watching the Military Channel tonight when I saw a recruiting commercial for the U.S. Navy SEALs. It's very brief, but it's by far the most creative and thought-provoking ad I've seen in a long, long time. Check it out.

I looked over the casualty statistics kept by the Iraq Coalition Casualties site, and decided to whip up two quick charts. The stats I focused on were the American military deaths per month during Operation Iraqi Freedom between March '03 and March '06.

First, the raw numbers:

Deaths per month

Next, to better follow the trends, here are the trailing averages for 6 months and 12 months:

Deaths per month, trailing averages

I'll crunch more numbers if there's enough demand for it, but for now this will do. People will look at these figures through their own political lenses, so for once I'll refrain from immediately offering my conservative viewpoint. These are the numbers. Make of them what you will.

--

FYI (if you're not a stats whiz) ...

6-month trailing average: the average for the most recent six months.

12-month trailing average: the average for the most recent twelve months.

--

August 2006 update: revised figures

Sen. Lincoln Chafee, the ultimate RINO

user-pic

Things like this and this are why I contributed to Stephen Laffey's campaign.

National Review Online has an immigration essay by Senator Bill Frist, which contains these key paragraphs:

Last year, Judd Gregg and others lead an effort to hire 1,500 new border patrol agents and build 1,800 new detention beds. The proposal we will consider next week provides nearly $2 billion to build a border fence in high-traffic areas, add new border-patrol aircraft to help police lower traffic areas, and support training for additional Customs and Border Protection Agents.

...

[Our] action now must occur in concert with finishing action on the bigger immigration bill in May. That legislation contains the full multiyear plan to beef up border-security operations dramatically, including a virtual fence that uses a mix of physical and electronic means to secure every inch of our 1,951-mile border with Mexico.

No, no, no. Wrong. Just as a virtual condom is not a condom, a virtual fence is not a fence. We want a physical barrier, not this:

Virtual fence

When it comes to scuttling one's own presidential ambitions, Bill Frist is doing yeoman's work.

Cliff May has some direct questions for SecDef Rumsfeld's critics:

The question is not whether Donald Rumsfeld should resign. The question is not even who should replace him. The question is: What goals would a new Secretary of Defense set, and what strategies would he implement to achieve them?

If Rumsfeld's critics believe America's military has met its match on the battlefields of Iraq, they should say so forthrightly. But they should talk, too, about the ramifications of an American defeat in the heart of the Arab Middle East.

...

A separate question � one well worth asking � is whether a Pentagon reshaped by Rumsfeld will be all that it can be; whether it will be capable of employing organized violence more effectively than America's adversaries (which is, after all, the mission).

...

Retired generals should be welcomed into the debate on military transformation. But they can't make much of a contribution until and unless they start asking the right questions.

I couldn't have said it better myself.

TigerHawk is tired of hearing his fellow Americans complain about the price of gas at the pump:

People are evidently outraged over "high" gasoline prices -- otherwise television personalities like O'Reilly and out-of-office politicians wouldn't be beating the tom-toms about them. Who has not seen the tedious local news programs with stories about people pawning their heirlooms to buy gasoline? But isn't this all so much idiocy? My assertion is this: however "high" gasoline prices may be by historical standards, gasoline remains a fantastic value. If it weren't, then people would take obvious and simple steps to curtail their gasoline consumption. They don't, because even at $3 per gallon they would rather burn gas than bear some other burden. Gas is so cheap that most Americans won't do anything to conserve it.

Excellent analysis. You should definitely take two minutes and read the whole thing while you sip your $4/gallon Coca-Cola.

I'm encouraged by the results of a new Rasmussen poll:

Just 26% of Americans say they will definitely vote for Senator Hillary Clinton if she runs for President in 2008. That matches the lowest level of support ever recorded for the former First Lady and is the sixth consecutive Hillary Meter poll showing her solid support below 30%.

I'm pleased, naturally. But it's only 2006. This is no time to get complacent.

Kelo comes to Cleveland

user-pic

WTAM just mentioned that the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority voted in support of the City of Cleveland exercising eminent domain to take several commercial properties and turn them over to a private developer.

Keep in mind that this vote does not trigger the city's eminent domain powers; only City Council can do that, not the Port Authority. But today's vote tosses the issue squarely into City Council's lap, which is clearly a heavy-handed negotiating tactic. The eminent domain threat is designed to pressure the last hold-outs to sell their properties to Scott Wolstein for a multi-million-dollar redevelopment venture. It's a pretty blatant strong-arm job, but hey ... that's Cleveland politics for you.

I found the CCCPA news release, which includes the following:

The Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority voted unanimously to authorize eminent domain proceedings if further negotiations do not result in the acquisition of several properties identified for redevelopment in the Flats east bank.

Eminent domain is always a last resort, but the agency must be prepared when all good faith efforts to reach an agreement have been exhausted, Chairman John Carney said today at the port's board meeting.

"We are still hopeful we can resolve this situation before it actually goes to the courts. That is still our desire," he said.

...

"The [Uniform Relocation Act] very clearly spells out the rules for acquiring property for redevelopment. We are not given a choice in the matter. Either we follow the letter of the law, or the project could be in jeopardy," Loftus told board members.

Note the phrase "acquiring property for redevelopment." This is exactly the kind of eminent domain taking that sparked the lawsuit in Kelo v. New London. If approved by City Council, this will be another example of a local government seizing private property from one private citizen and giving it to another.

Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority Chairman John Carney said:

"The project will transform a crime-ridden area plagued with neglected buildings and deserted streets into a thriving lakefront neighborhood. This will result in millions of dollars in revenue for the region and thousands of construction and full-time permanent jobs."

Ah, yes. The famously elastic "blight" loophole is back again. Eminent domain seizures often target "blighted" areas that are declared to be unsafe or hazardous to the public in some major way. The catch is that the definition of "blight" has never been firmly settled. If the government wants your property badly enough, it will find a way to declare it "blighted."

The Cleveland City Council had better beware, though. The Ohio Legislature's moratorium on these types of eminent domain takings will not expire until December 31st. The penalties for violating the moratorium are pretty stiff.

I'll have more to say about this shortly.

The latest campaign finance numbers are out, and here's where the competitors for Ohio's 13th congressional district stand.

Republicans
 Net receiptsNet disbursementsCashDebtThrough
Burtzlaff, Paul$7,470$5,447$2,022$004/15/2006
Foltin, Craig$214,254$28,233$186,020$004/12/2006
McGrew, David$62,149$55,071$7,077$004/12/2006
Ortega, Jose$67,102$39,508$12,137$15,00012/31/2005
 
 
Democrats
 Net receiptsNet disbursementsCashDebtThrough
Cafaro, Capri$1,952,634$1,785,376$58,729$1,452,07004/12/2006
Grace, William$42,956$29,879$13,076$004/12/2006
Kucinich, Gary$18,927$16,574$2,353$2,14304/12/2006
Sawyer, Thomas$45,397$11,589$33,807$003/31/2006
Sutton, Betty$422,910$405,488$21,533$004/12/2006
Wolfe, John$18,477$16,187$2,289$14,50003/31/2006

We're now in the home stretch and heading for the May 2nd primary. The Plain Dealer reports on these FEC filings in today's issue, too. Here's one eye-opening paragraph:

Capri Cafaro, a Democrat, showed the most money committed to the race, pumping $865,000 of her own money into her campaign. Cafaro, a shopping mall heiress from Youngstown, had less than $1,000 in contributions from other donors.

Even Ohio's Democrats aren't foolish enough to run Capri "Shopping Mall Heiress" Cafaro in the general election ... but I can still dream.

So much for Iranian "super torpedoes"

user-pic

It turns out that Russian-designed supercavitating torpedoes aren't really the threat they're made out to be.

Below you'll find links to stuff I've read lately about the so-called "revolt of the generals."

  • Richard Halloran asks (without answering) if retired military officers should publicly question the decisions of civilians in charge of the military.
  • Charles Krauthammer emphatically replies "no."
  • Unfortunately (but not at all surprisingly) the L.A. Times uses the generals' complaints as an excuse to hunt for unflattering quotes from deployed military members in the war zone. The Times only found one officer, and that coward declined to be identified ... rather than taking the principled approach and either resigning his commission or retiring.
  • Oliver North repeats an increasingly common theme and wonders why the generals waited until now to complain, rather than resigning.
  • David Mastio sees parallels between the current controversy and a seemingly unrelated incident from World War II, namely General Patton's famous slapping incidents.
  • Cassandra at Villainous Company cautions civilians not to read too much into the controversy, suspects that at least one of the disgruntled generals is actually longing for President Bush's head on a platter, and handily debunks the charge that the "swift-boating" of the generals has begun.
  • AcademicElephant thinks SecDef Rumsfeld has taken the wind out of his opponents' sails, and that now is the time to press the P.R. advantage.
  • Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice restrains political speech by active-duty commissioned military officers.

... now comes a report that she can leg-press 400 pounds. Next we'll be reading about how much Janet Reno can curl.

Hat tip: Drudge

Faith and politics, all in a handy chart

user-pic

Click on it.

Credit: Bill Marsh / NY Times

Hat tip: He Lives, via NixGuy.com

John Palmer at Cleveland Townhall looks at our fiesty Republican primary race and sees an opportunity for conservatives:

Eminent domain abuse in Norwood, OH

user-pic

George Will highlights another clear example of eminent domain abuse in his latest Newsweek column. A few key paragraphs:

The Gambles say that when the city offered them money for their house, they were not interested. "We had everything we wanted, right there," says Joy, who does not drive but could walk to see her mother in a Norwood nursing home. "We loved that house -- that home."


Past tense. Norwood's government, in a remarkably incestuous deal, accepted the developer's offer to pay the cost of the study that -- surprise! -- enabled the city to declare the neighborhood "blighted" and "deteriorating." NEWSWEEK reader, stroll around your neighborhood. Do you see any broken sidewalk pavement? Any standing water in a road? Any weeds? Such factors -- never mind that sidewalks and roads are government's responsibility -- were cited by the developer's study to justify Norwood's forcing the Gambles and their neighbors to sell to the developer so he could build condominiums, office buildings and stores.

...

Reeling from the life-shattering effects of an uncircumscribed power of eminent domain, the Gambles are hoping for rescue by their state Supreme Court, before which they are represented by the Institute for Justice, a merry band of libertarian litigators. The Gambles have the dignified stoicism of uncomplicated people put upon by sophisticated people nimble with complex sophistries. Carl says, "We're paying a lot each month for storage" of their possessions that do not fit in his daughter's basement near the town of Independence, Ky. Independence is what becomes tenuous when property rights become attenuated.

This could happen to you, folks. If you happen to live in Ohio, please read my post on the Ohio eminent domain task force that's ignoring the major objection to eminent domain abuse: people don't want the government taking their property and giving it to another private property owner. Ever.

As George Will wrote, "Kelo demonstrated that anyone who owns a modest home or small business owns it only at the sufferance of a local government that might, on a whim of rapacity, seize it to enrich a more attractive potential taxpayer."

Hat tip: No Left Turns

Carnival of Ohio Politics #19

user-pic

Newshound has the latest roundup of Ohio political blogging. Pull up a seat and dig in.

Courtesy of The Enquirer, I learned yesterday that a nonpartisan voter education group called Ohio Citizen Action released a report analyzing all of the fundraising by Ohio gubernatorial candidates in 2005. I read the report ...

... and found some very newsworthy nuggets of information. For starters, here are the top five contributors to Ken Blackwell and Jim Petro:

General Zinni contradicts himself

user-pic

Covering the "revolt of the generals" against SecDef Donald Rumsfeld, Fox News' heavy hitter Brit Hume found two contradictory quotes from the revolt's leader:

Former Clinton CENTCOM commander, Anthony Zinni � the most prominent of the retired generals attacking Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld � now says that, in the run-up to the war in Iraq, "What bothered me ... [was that] I was hearing a depiction of the intelligence that didn't fit what I knew. There was no solid proof, that I ever saw, that Saddam had WMD."

But in early 2000, Zinni told Congress "Iraq remains the most significant near-term threat to U.S. interests in the Arabian Gulf region," adding, "Iraq probably is continuing clandestine nuclear research, [and] retains stocks of chemical and biological munitions ... Even if Baghdad reversed its course and surrendered all WMD capabilities, it retains scientific, technical, and industrial infrastructure to replace agents and munitions within weeks or months."

Oops. This kind of thing tends to hurt one's credibility.

Eminent domain gone insane

user-pic

The greedy politicians in North Hills, NY are using eminent domain to seize a golf course and turn it into ... another golf course. Unbelievable? Don't be so shocked.

Hat tip: Club for Growth

How many generals oppose Rumsfeld?

user-pic

Katrina Vanden Heuvel, the editor of The Nation, relishes the controversy over a few retired generals who have called for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to resign. Joining the media dogpile, Vanden Heuvel asks:

Batiste. Eaton. Newbold. Riggs. Zinni... Is there a retired general left in the States who hasn't called on Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to fall on his sword? While The Nation suggested he resign in April, 2003, an unanticipated and unprecedented cast of characters has joined the growing chorus.

So far something like six of these guys have sounded off. Heck, I'll be generous. Let's say a full dozen are out there talking to the mainstream media and urging Rumsfeld's ouster. Where does that leave us? Right here, Katrina:

The dirty dozen Everybody else












































Yes, that's a giant chorus of condemnation. This is only based on the estimate that there are roughly 4,700 retired generals and admirals, so do your own math. Maybe it'll be more persuasive.

--

Update: Welcome, readers of Hugh Hewitt, PoliPundit.com, TKS, Ed Driscoll, Right Wing News and RedState! Enjoy your stay here at Brain Shavings, and be sure to drop by the Buckeye Bloggers before you go.

Take a look at some amazing maps that track religion in America, county-by-county.

Happy Easter!

user-pic
Empty tomb

The tomb lies empty! Christ is risen! He is risen indeed!

Happy Easter, everybody!

5th Amendment textThe Ohio task force on eminent domain has released its preliminary report, and it's missed the most important point of the exercise. I'm not interested in a fairer procedure for the government to use as it takes my home. I'm not interested in a clearer definition of "blight" that spells out exactly when the government can take my home. You see, I don't want the government to take my home at all. Why is that so hard to understand?

A local or state government can exercise its eminent domain powers to take private property from its owner, if the government does so for a "public use" and pays "just compensation" (see the Fifth Amendment, at right). Until very recently, the term "public use" meant what you'd expect: building a school, putting in a highway, laying railroad tracks, and other projects that the public has access to.

We used to think of private building projects as a "private use" of property, since the public doesn't have guaranteed access. But no more. Thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Kelo v. New London last summer, the definition of "public use" has expanded to include the government seizing your land and giving it to another private owner for "economic development" (which means the new owner's project yields higher property taxes than you do, or creates jobs, or some similar rationalization).

Liberals and conservatives alike blew a collective gasket over the ruling, and angry voters have already pressured several state legislatures into passing laws prohibiting these takings through eminent domain.

UC Santa Cruz to lose all tax money?

user-pic

I'm pleased to note that The Mountain States Legal Foundation has officially asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to withhold all federal taxpayer money from The University of California at Santa Cruz because yesterday the university again allowed student mobs to harass military recruiters and hound them from the campus. From the MSLF press release:

"It is outrageous that members of the Armed Forces, who are asked to serve in harm�s way in Afghanistan and Iraq, are driven from a campus by a mob in America," said William Perry Pendley, president and chief legal officer of Mountain States Legal Foundation. "Unless Secretary Rumsfeld responds to this craven violation of federal law, radicals on other campuses will be emboldened, will endanger the lives of men and women in uniform, and will deny students the right to learn how they may serve their country."

The Solomon Amendment, named after the late Congressman Jerry Solomon (R-NY), requires colleges and universities to allow military recruiters on campuses "at least equal in quality and scope to the [degree of] access to campuses and to students that is provided to any other employer." The law was enacted in 1996 but was not enforced by the Clinton Administration.

The Solomon Amendment is on very firm constitutional ground. Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a resounding defeat to a liberal group called the Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (FAIR), which had tried to get the courts to overturn the Solomon Amendment. Here's the unanimous (8-0) ruling in Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.

I hope Secretary Rumsfeld triggers the Solomon Amendment. The radical anti-American left needs a good smacking-down.

Hat tip: Michelle Malkin

If you've ever wondered what physically happened to Jesus during his crucifixion, you need only read "On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ", which first appeared in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 1986.

As for whether Jesus actually rose from the dead, here's a brief outline explaining why it makes sense to believe that He did.

Carnival of Ohio Politics #18

user-pic

Newshound has the latest round-up of blog posts covering Ohio politics. Well worth the read!

My response to the open borders lobby

user-pic

Krauthammer: build a wall first

user-pic

Charles Krauthammer's latest column makes the same major point as many of us on the center-right side of immigration politics:

My proposition is this: A vast number of Americans who oppose legalization and fear new waves of immigration would change their minds if we could radically reduce new -- i.e., future -- illegal immigration.

Forget employer sanctions. Build a barrier. It is simply ridiculous to say it cannot be done. If one fence won't do it, then build a second 100 yards behind it. And then build a road for patrols in between. Put in cameras. Put in sensors. Put out lots of patrols.

Can't be done? Israel's border fence has been extraordinarily successful in keeping out potential infiltrators who are far more determined than mere immigrants. Nor have very many North Koreans crossed into South Korea in the past 50 years.

Of course it will be ugly. So are the concrete barriers to keep truck bombs from driving into the White House. But sometimes necessity trumps aesthetics. And don't tell me that this is our Berlin Wall. When you build a wall to keep people in, that's a prison. When you build a wall to keep people out, that's an expression of sovereignty. The fence around your house is a perfectly legitimate expression of your desire to control who comes into your house to eat, sleep and use the facilities. It imprisons no one.

Of course, no barrier will be foolproof. But it doesn't have to be. It simply has to reduce the river of illegals to a manageable trickle. Once we can do that, everything becomes possible -- most especially, humanizing the situation of our 11 million illegals.

Amen. Building a wall sure beats caving in to the open borders crowd, as the Senate Republican leadership just did.

If you build it, they won't come.

Call it what it is: amnesty

user-pic

Michelle Malkin's latest roundup on the Republican Senate's immigration wuss-a-palooza says it all.

I also like this handy visual retort to the open borders crowd:

gringo_bush.jpg
© 2005 Jay D. Dyson
(click image to enlarge)

As I said yesterday, build a wall first and deal with the rest later. I'll let Michelle rip the amnesty deal for me. My temper's too short on this subject to write anything temperate right now.

Tell Hugh Hewitt I did my duty. I gave a copy of this ...

Buy this book!

... to Congressional candidate Paul Burtzlaff last night.

Paul Burtzlaff photographHe's running for the open seat in Ohio's 13th Congressional District, which was vacated this year by Sherrod Brown. A conservative Republican, Burtzlaff is a former Navy chaplain who's now a Lutheran pastor at St. Paul Lutheran Church in Westlake, OH. I'm a parishioner there, so I know the man well and endorse him heartily. His honesty and integrity are beyond reproach, so you can trust him to follow through on his promises (much like somebody else we all know).

He's strong on national security, and his campaign is also emphasizing his commitment to improving education and bringing jobs to Ohio. He's never run for public office before, so he's no member of the Washington "in crowd", nor is he one of the Ohio GOP establishment elites who brought us candidates like Bob Taft and Jim Petro. Burtzlaff is refreshingly straightforward and open about his policy positions, so you'll always know what he believes and why. He doesn't flip-flop, either.

I'll be supporting Paul Burtzlaff's campaign, and hopefully before long there will be some seriously meaty information to publish about this candidate. For instance, although there's no press release yet, Burtzlaff just won the endorsement of The Ohio Right to Life Society, and he will also be the focus of a Meet The Bloggers session on Saturday the 15th if the MTB crew agrees to the date (details coming soon).

Keep your eye on Paul Burtzlaff. The results of the May 2nd Republican primary might just surprise you.

Tonight at 8 P.M., Rightalk.com is carrying the audio of a live debate between David Horowitz and Ward Churchill. The topic is "Can Politics Be Taken Out of The Classroom, and Should It Be?" The Windows Media feed is here.

Hat tip: Little Green Footballs

Investor's Business Daily recently asked some pointed questions and waited for answers from the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR):

Is Islam the only religion with a doctrine, theology and legal system that mandates warfare against unbelievers?

Is it true that 26 chapters of the Quran deal with jihad, a fight able-bodied believers are obligated to join (Surah 2:216), and that the text orders Muslims to "instill terror into the hearts of the unbeliever" and to "smite above their necks" (8:12)?

Is the "test" of loyalty to Allah not good acts or faith in general, but martyrdom that results from fighting unbelievers (47:4) � the only assurance of salvation in Islam (4:74; 9:111)?

Are the sins of any Muslim who becomes a martyr forgiven by the very act of being slain while slaying the unbelievers (4:96)?

And is it really true that martyrs are rewarded with virgins, among other carnal delights, in Paradise (38:51, 55:56; 55:76; 56:22)?

Are those unable to do jihad � such as women or the elderly � required to give "asylum and aid" to those who do fight unbelievers in the cause of Allah (8:74)?

Does Islam advocate expansion by force? And is the final command of jihad, as revealed to Muhammad in the Quran, to conquer the world in the name of Islam (9:29)?

Is Islam the only religion that does not teach the Golden Rule (48:29)? Does the Quran instead teach violence and hatred against non-Muslims, specifically Jews and Christians (5:50)?

IBD is still waiting to hear from the "moderates." What a surprise.

Build the wall first

user-pic
Cox & Forkum cartoon

I've been keeping quiet on the illegal immigration debate, because I know I'm likely to get hot under the collar and write something I'll regret later. Both of my parents are naturalized citizens, as are my uncles and aunts, and as were my grandparents. As a child of legal immigrants, I'm quite anti-illegal-alien in my outlook. That's why I've been biting my tongue. However, I'm also a veteran, and national security is my number one priority. Since the Senate has crafted a disastrous "compromise" on illegal immigration today, there's one thing I simply must put on the record now: America needs to build a wall along the entire Mexican border, and we need to do it as soon as possible.

I approach the problem as a retired Coast Guardsman. The massive influx of illegals is like seawater flooding a ship through a hole in the hull. The top priority is to stop the flooding. Pumping the water out can wait. Drying out the wet spaces belowdecks can wait. Upgrading to a thicker hull can wait. Plug the hole first. Deal with the results afterward.

This is a national security issue, not a race issue or an economic issue. This wouldn't be a "Berlin Wall"; our wall would keep enemies out, not oppressed citizens in. Our border with Mexico is our giant back door, and it's hanging wide open. Locking the front door and putting bars on the windows makes no sense if we leave the back door open. Islamists can slip into our Southwest as easily as anybody else can, and they aren't looking for jobs. No "virtual wall" will do. We need a long, high physical barrier like the one Israel built. Israel's wall drastically reduced the number of terrorist attacks from the West Bank and Gaza, and ours would make it much harder for terrorists to perpetrate a new Beslan massacre in Arizona.

I understand that making our border into a barrier will upset the Mexican government, but I care more about our national security than I care about keeping the Mexicans happy. I understand that illegal immigrants will try to find other ways into the country. Fine; we'll plug those gaps when we find them. We might want to build another wall along some or all of our border with Canada, too, and I'm willing to start near Detroit. But our top priority must be to build a long, high wall between us and Mexico. Every other immigration issue can wait.

Cox & Forkum cartoon

There, I said it.

Update: Hugh Hewitt knows what's most important, too.

Flags in the rigging

user-pic

Michelle Malkin put out a call for favorite photos of the American flag, so here's mine.

Fly it high

When I was still in the Coast Guard, I snapped this image looking up into the rigging of USCGC BITTERSWEET at her decomissioning ceremony on August 18, 1997. She's now named the Valvas, and serves in the Estonian Border Guard.

Atom/RSS Twitter Facebook