If you’re not a Christian, you might find this post mildly interesting, but it probably won’t tickle your gray cells much. Most of you Christians out there trying to argue against gay “marriage” need to understand my point and adjust your approach.
- The legalization of homosexual marriage will quickly destroy the traditional family.
- Children will suffer most.
- Public schools in every state will embrace homosexuality.
- Adoption laws will be instantly obsolete.
- Foster-care programs will be impacted dramatically.
- The health care system will stagger and perhaps collapse.
- Social Security will be severely stressed.
- Religious freedom will almost certainly be jeopardized.
- Other nations are watching our march toward homosexual marriage and will follow our lead.
- The gospel of Jesus Christ will be severely curtailed.
- The culture war will be over, and the world may soon become “as it was in the days of Noah” (Matthew 24:37).
I think Greg Koukl over at Stand To Reason does a much better job of persuading undecided people who don’t tackle this issue from an evangelical Christian worldview. In Dobson’s defense, his audience is almost exclusively evangelical Christians like me, and his excerpted essay aims to get us off our lazy butts and do something about the problem.
Think of it this way. There are plenty of arguments you could use to oppose gay “marriage”, signified by the inside of the light brown circle. Some of them have foundations in a Christian worldview (the darker circle). The wise advocate for traditional marriage will select the right intellectual ammunition for each target. You might be convinced that our Christian arguments give you more than enough to get the job done, but non-Christians respond to that approach like a tank responds to a pistol bullet.
Yes, I know we’re right. But tactically speaking, your sincere beliefs don’t mean anything to someone who doesn’t recognize the authority of the Bible. How receptive are you when you hear a muslim arguing that Islam must be the one true faith, because the miraculous beauty and structure of the Quran shows that it couldn’t possibly be otherwise? Their source of authority is illegitimate in your worldview. And just like them, you’re trying to knock out a tank with a handgun.
If you don’t want to be a gooey blob in somebody’s tank treads, pick up an intellectual anti-tank missile. Use arguments that stand some chance of getting past the non-Christian’s armor. I’ve highlighted five of Dobson’s eleven points that have some promise. Not all of them are potential winning shots, but at least they can do some good.
Try using what you find here:
- “Street Theatre in the Bay Area” by Frank Beckwith
- “Fags Doom Nation?” by Greg Koukl
- “Homosexuality: Giving Your Point of View” by Greg Koukl
- “The Liberal Case Against Gay Marriage” by By Susan M. Shell
- “FMA: Aye” by David Frum
- “Marriage Matters” by Maggie Gallagher
- Questions and Answers on FRC.org
- “Same-Sex Marriage — Challenges and Responses” by Greg Koukl
- “Unhealthy Half Truths” by Stanley Kurtz
- “Equal Rights for Homosexuals” by Greg Koukl
Commentary on news
- “Power to the People” by Stanley Kurtz
- “What Marriage Is For ” by Maggie Gallagher
- “Gay Marriage vs. American Marriage” by Kay S. Hymowitz
I’ll keep adding bullets as I find more good material.